Crypto’s Washington Strategy Gains Ground as Solana Builds a Policy Presence
A sustained campaign of bipartisan education, legislative engagement and institutional investment is reshaping crypto’s position in Washington, according to a CoinDesk opinion essay.

Crypto’s long-term campaign in Washington is beginning to produce measurable results, according to a CoinDesk opinion essay by Colin McLaren. The shift matters for ecosystems such as Solana, which has moved from being largely unknown in federal policy circles to becoming part of the industry’s broader institutional presence.
From Enforcement to Engagement
Four years ago, the crypto industry had few allies in Washington and was burdened by the conduct of its worst actors. Regulation by enforcement generated nearly $500 million in investigations and litigation, according to the essay—capital that the industry argued could have supported the development of the next generation of American companies.
The industry eventually concluded that litigation alone would not deliver regulatory clarity. Instead, it adopted a patient strategy focused on educating lawmakers, influencing legislative text and building durable policy institutions inside the Beltway.
That effort included organizations such as the Blockchain Association, DeFi Education Fund, Stand With Crypto, Crypto Council for Innovation, American Innovation Project and the Solana Policy Institute. These groups have briefed congressional offices, submitted comment letters and helped make crypto networks and companies more familiar participants in policy debates.
Bipartisan Momentum in Congress
The essay argues that the strategy’s impact is visible in recent voting records. Republicans provided near-unanimous majorities for crypto-related measures over the past two years, while a growing group of Democrats supported specific efforts to revise how digital assets are treated under federal rules.
Key milestones cited in the essay include:
- 21 House Democrats voted to overturn SAB 121, a policy affecting how financial institutions account for digital assets.
- 76 House Democrats later supported repealing the broker rule, reflecting the argument that software should not automatically be regulated like a centralized intermediary.
- 18 Senate Democrats helped move the GENIUS Act past the filibuster.
- The broker-rule repeal became the first crypto-specific law in American history, while GENIUS became the first federal stablecoin statute.
- The House Ways and Means Committee reported a digital asset tax bill by 38–5 and rejected an amendment that would have restored the broker rule.
What This Means
The policy environment remains unfinished, but the direction described by the essay is more consequential than any single vote. A clearer federal framework could reduce uncertainty for developers, stablecoin issuers, exchanges and institutional participants building on networks such as Solana.
The essay also says regulators are temporarily filling gaps left by Congress. The SEC has issued its anticipated “Regulation Crypto” and innovation exemption, the CFTC has proposed a structure for crypto trading on regulated exchanges, and agencies have issued rules implementing GENIUS.
For Solana, the takeaway is strategic: policy credibility is built through sustained participation, not a one-time lobbying push. Continued engagement by ecosystem institutions may help ensure that future rules distinguish open-source software and decentralized networks from centralized intermediaries, while giving market participants a more predictable basis for investment and development.